Whether you're creating with AI or protecting your work from it — get clear, practical guidance on copyright law, landmark cases, and compliance.
The Ansel Adams Trust's condemnation of an unauthorized AI-colorized print of 'Moonrise' has exposed gaps in copyright law for AI-generated derivative works. Here's what creators, users, and estate managers need to know about AI remixes and copyright in 2026.
When AI tools fabricated quotes in a book about AI and truth, it exposed a systemic failure in publishing's fact-checking processes.
The Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf (case I-20 W 2/26) holds that AI-generated images only qualify for copyright when a human exercises recognizable creative control, while AI-assisted imitation of a photo's underlying idea is permissible as long as the protectable elements remain untouched.
| Case | Party | Status | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| NYT v. OpenAI | New York Times vs. OpenAI, Microsoft | Active - Discovery | NYT alleges millions of articles used to train Cha |
| Getty v. Stability AI | Getty Images vs. Stability AI | Active | 12 million images allegedly copied for Stable Diff |
| Thaler v. Perlmutter | Stephen Thaler vs. Copyright Office | Closed - SCOTUS Denied | AI cannot be author. Supreme Court denied cert Mar |
| Authors v. Anthropic | Andrea Bartz et al. vs. Anthropic | Settlement Rejected | 1.5B settlement rejected by judge. |
Whether you're protecting your creative work or using AI responsibly — we've got you covered.
Your work was scraped to train AI. Learn your rights, opt-out options, and whether you have a legal claim.
Using AI in your products or content? Stay compliant and avoid costly lawsuits with practical guidance.
Practical tools to help you navigate AI copyright — no signup required.
Weekly digest of new rulings, regulations, and practical guidance. Join 2,000+ creators and legal professionals.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.